Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorTorbjørnsen, Tor
dc.contributor.authorPargament, Kenneth I
dc.contributor.authorStifoss-Hanssen, Hans
dc.contributor.authorHestad, Knut
dc.contributor.authorDanbolt, Lars Johan
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-22T10:19:02Z
dc.date.available2023-02-22T10:19:02Z
dc.date.created2021-02-25T13:14:33Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationArchive for the Psychology of Religion/ Archiv für Religionspsychologie. 2021, 43 (1), 3-20.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0084-6724
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3053136
dc.description.abstractReligious coping and spiritual struggles were qualitatively analyzed in 15 semi-structured interviews with Norwegian Hodgkin’s disease survivors. We asked, How is religious coping expressed in 15 Norwegian Hodgkin’s disease survivors? The analyses were theory-driven, using religious coping and spiritual struggles theories as explorative tools. Especially we focused on coping processes, coping dynamics, coping styles, and coping activities. The analyses show that religiousness functioned as a positive factor in coping with cancer in 14 of the 15 participants, equally distributed as conservational and transformational coping. The combination of the belief in a good, present God, eventually positive divine power, accessible through prayer, and religious support from people around the participants, were the most prominent activities in the religious coping processes. The religious coping had a character of being collaborative for almost all of the participants. Many participants had severe spiritual struggles. For many of the participants, it was difficult not only to be sick, but also to be a survivor. Theories on religious coping and spiritual struggles were useful and adaptable to a Norwegian sample regarding the main dynamics in the religious coping and spiritual struggles processes. The analyses detected a few different religious coping activities in this Norwegian sample compared to those identified in American samples, with the importance of meeting God in nature as the most significant difference.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse-Ikkekommersiell 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjectReligiøs mestringen_US
dc.subjectMestringen_US
dc.subjectHodgkin's diseaseen_US
dc.title“If you and I and our Lord . . .”: A qualitative study of religious coping in Hodgkin’s diseaseen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Teologi og religionsvitenskap: 150en_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Theology and religious studies: 150en_US
dc.source.pagenumber3-20en_US
dc.source.volume43en_US
dc.source.journalArchive for the Psychology of Religion/ Archiv für Religionspsychologieen_US
dc.source.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/0084672420983482
dc.identifier.cristin1893688
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode2


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse-Ikkekommersiell 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse-Ikkekommersiell 4.0 Internasjonal