• norsk
    • English
  • English 
    • norsk
    • English
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Home
  • MF vitenskapelig høyskole for teologi, religion og samfunn
  • Masteravhandlinger / Master theses
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • MF vitenskapelig høyskole for teologi, religion og samfunn
  • Masteravhandlinger / Master theses
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Communicating religion - a question of clarity : Exploring the Council of Europe Recommendation CM/Rec (2008) 12 of the Committee of Ministers to member states on the dimension of religions and non-religious convictions within intercultural education

Eriksson, Kristin Skarning
Master thesis
Thumbnail
View/Open
AVH5035-kand-nr-6082-masteravhandling-Eriksson-navn.pdf (1.359Mb)
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/11250/161239
Date
2013-09-09
Metadata
Show full item record
Collections
  • Masteravhandlinger / Master theses [1256]
Abstract
The Council of Europe is engaged in promoting education for democratic citizenship through

an intercultural education approach. Within this approach is a religious dimension. A

Recommendation by the Committee of Ministers was issued in 2008: ‘The Recommendation

CM/Rec (2008) 12 of the Committee of Ministers to member states on the dimension of

religions and non-religious convictions within intercultural education’. This is a policy

document on how to introduce the concept in education policies, institutions and the

development of teacher training. The aim of the Recommendation is to ensure the dimension

of religions and non-religious convictions within intercultural education is accepted as a

contribution to strengthen human rights, democratic citizenship and participation, and to the

development of competences for intercultural dialogue.

The study is an exploration of the communication on religion described in the above policy

document. An interpretative approach was used to search for different meanings of ‘religion’

and ‘religious dimension’. A tentative impression was that different actors had employed

diverging meanings of the concepts in the Recommendation, and that this resulted in a textual

tension in the document. A document analysis was performed with tools from domain

analysis and text revision theory with an appreciation of how discourses are established. The

Recommendation was compared with a draft version and supplementary material. The

analysis was interpretative and focused on meaning and intention. A theoretical discussion

followed with the aim of seeing how discourses on religion and society were reflected in the

Recommendation.

The analysis showed that there had been many amendments to the text. These appeared as

adjustments and conceptually new meanings of policy. Traces of different discourses were

found, especially on ‘religion’ and ‘religion as a cultural fact’. Partial, rather than complete

replacements of concepts, resulted in a lack of clarity in the Recommendation and uncertainty

regarding Council of Europe Policy on the role and place of religion. ‘Religion’ was for

instance defined both including and excluding secular worldviews. ‘Religion as a cultural

fact’ and ‘religions and non-religious convictions as cultural facts’, were used intermittently

in an inconsistent manner in the Recommendation and its Explanatory Memorandum. The conclusion was that there is a textual tension in the Recommendation. I suggest that the alterations that were presented in the analysis might be a result of the background of the

various contributors to the writing and editing process. There is also reason to question

whether the intention of the Council of Europe in paying attention to an increasing religious

diversity through building competence for dialogue is maintained. The Council recognised

that the earlier lack of attention to the importance of religion and values for individual and

social identity had to be reversed in order to build a cohesive society. I suggest that the

introduction of ‘non-religious convictions’ is blurring this intention. The communication on

religion does not display the clarity that would seem required in order to promote the project

of learning about religion and values in an intercultural education approach.

Contact Us | Send Feedback

Privacy policy
DSpace software copyright © 2002-2019  DuraSpace

Service from  Unit
 

 

Browse

ArchiveCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDocument TypesJournalsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDocument TypesJournals

My Account

Login

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

Contact Us | Send Feedback

Privacy policy
DSpace software copyright © 2002-2019  DuraSpace

Service from  Unit