• norsk
    • English
  • English 
    • norsk
    • English
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Home
  • MF vitenskapelig høyskole for teologi, religion og samfunn
  • Masteravhandlinger / Master theses
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • MF vitenskapelig høyskole for teologi, religion og samfunn
  • Masteravhandlinger / Master theses
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Small Christian Communities and Development in Cameroon

Nkwawir, Jude Fanwong
Master thesis
Thumbnail
View/Open
AVH5035-kand-nr-8000-masteravh-Fanwong-navn.pdf (1.493Mb)
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/11250/1603403
Date
2015-10-01
Metadata
Show full item record
Collections
  • Masteravhandlinger / Master theses [808]
Abstract
The aim of my study was to answer the research question and sub questions, in other

words, to find out the relationship between Small Christian Communities ( SCCs) and

development; their vision of development, as a mission of the church or a secular task?

According to SCCs, the mission of the church is to impact faith, to evangelize the people, to

proclaim the Word of God or to make Him known, to bring peace and salvation, to help the

poor and to practice charity. Her most important mission is to dispense peace, love, unity and

salvation. However, this does not exclude her from engaging in development work and

practice. Cases abound where the Church is involved in developmental issues: poverty

alleviation, health care services, education, and provision of clean portable water.

Contrary to some assumptions, mindsets, practices and views, therefore, development

is an essential aspect of the mission of the Church. This is rooted in the mission of Christ

which was characterized by the concern he showed to those who were suffering.

Consequently, as John Paul II has said, “ It is impossible to accept that in evangelization one

could or should ignore the importance of the problems so much discussed today, concerning

justice, liberation, development and peace in the world” (John Paul II, 1995, Ecclesia in

Africa, paragraph 68). Because of human dignity, people should not live in sub-human social,

economic, cultural and political conditions. In her evangelizing mission, therefore, the Church

should defend human dignity; strive for justice and peace, for the promotion, liberation, and

integral human development of all individual human beings (John Paul II, 1995, Ecclesia in

Africa, paragraph 69).

On the strength of this evidence, my conclusion is that the church has something to do

with development: it is her mission to be involved in developmental issues.

From the activities of SCCs and the answers to the interview questions, it is evident that there

is a relationship between the perspective of SCCs and the secular perspective on development.

It is a relationship of similarities and dissimilarities.

On the one hand, since the SCCs recognize the importance of human dignity, respect for

human rights, and the need for participation, their perspective on development is similar to the

human development paradigm which includes the basic needs, capabilities and freedomcentered

and enlarging people’s choices approaches.

The basic needs approach sees development as a moral imperative aimed at satisfying

the basic needs of human beings such as food, shelter, access to clean drinking water, health

care, sanitation, education, and to participate in decision-making processes. The human

development approach also envisages development as a process of expanding people’s capabilities and freedom. In this sense, the end of development is to give people the

opportunities to reach their human potentials, that is, to be educated, to be healthy, to

participate in the life of the community, to engage in relationships, to live in a peaceful

environment, and to enjoy nature.

Another commonality lies in the area of sustainable development (gender-centered and

environmental approaches). SCCs are concerned with social justice in the form of poverty

alleviation and gender equality and women empowerment as evident from the activities of the

women’s affairs commission. They also affirm the importance of environmental

sustainability. In this sense, SCCs bear some similarity with the conventional perspective on

development.

On the other hand, there are some fundamental differences from the point of view of

the anthropological vision of a human being, and the aim of development.For the SCCs, the

human being is a composite of body and soul, created to live in communion with other human

beings and with God; he/she finds ultimate fulfillment in God. This conception of the human

person introduces a more integral or holistic vision of human development, what is commonly

referred to as integral human development. Since human development is integral and is open

to the transcendental or spiritual aspect of life, the end of human progress is eternal life.

Without this dimension, economic and material development is insufficient to bring about

genuine development.

Contact Us | Send Feedback

Privacy policy
DSpace software copyright © 2002-2019  DuraSpace

Service from  Unit
 

 

Browse

ArchiveCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDocument TypesJournalsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDocument TypesJournals

My Account

Login

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

Contact Us | Send Feedback

Privacy policy
DSpace software copyright © 2002-2019  DuraSpace

Service from  Unit